Wednesday, 17 June 2015.
Assessment of the state of mental health in the Americas
Mental disorders are often reported in America. These disorders affect 44 million adults and 13.7 million children every year. The deaths that result from suicide are 8
The limits and difficulties associated with the payment of various established and fact-based methods or EBPs for children and adults are causes of differences in the quality of mental health. For private insurance, such as Medicaid or Medicare within the current system, reimbursement for specific EBP is hard. The rules of the current insurance coverage make it difficult to implement it. Private players, such as Medicaid and Medicare, have systems to compensate for services that do not allow charging for vital elements of various EBP programs, such as flexible business management, home visits and services that are not related to the face. Most private insurers do not have access to useful procedures, services, practices or support. Although Medicaid could cover most of the practices, suppliers could obtain compensation only if they were authorized to provide these services under the option or refusal (2014)
The current mental health system is facing a labour crisis. In addition to the lack of providers, the system also has suppliers who do not have the training necessary to provide facts and innovative methods. This has led to the fact that the labour force is not properly equipped to use modern medicine, helps patients suffer from mental disorders. Rural areas are worst affected by a shortage of professionals in the system. In addition, it may be clear in America that there is a shortage of professionals in America to deal with the elderly, children and adolescents (National Mental Health Alliance, 2014)
Not taking into account the importance of culturally sensitive services, educational programmes for mental health professionals in the Americas are generally not relevant to the development of cultural competence. Consequently, racial, ethnic and linguistic minorities are less represented in the current labour force. As Pacific islanders, African-Americans, American Indians, Hispanics, and Alaska are suffering from mental illness most of all. This is not due to high morbidity rates among these population groups, but due to poor quality of care and care (National Alliance on Mental Illness, 2014)
Most of the funds that offer mental health services are not funded. This problem is even worse in rural areas, where professionals who have mental health problems are only available in community mental health centres (CMHCE). There are serious financial difficulties faced by CMHCM, which limits their ability to provide health services to Americans in rural areas. These include long-term care recipients (Talbot & Coburn, 2013). In general, Medicaid funds CMCs in rural and urban areas. They receive income from sources that include government revenues and blocked grants from the federal government, which government mental health institutions allocate to these centres. Given that the reimbursement rates for Medicaid are low, CMHs in rural areas receive on average less funding for every patient they care about compared to urban service providers (Talbot and Coburn, 2013)
The funds allocated to state institutions that provide mental health have been reduced by most U.S. states between 2009 and 2011. The decline was $2.1 billion across the United States. This has encouraged public institutions, mental health services and CMCs in the financial crisis. Thus, the services offered by CMHCE were abolished and the workforce was reduced. Some are closed and some are merge operations. This particularly affects patients with mental health problems, especially in rural areas, as they depend on CMCS. Moreover, their dependence on a federal government grant, the main targets of which are adults, suffering from serious mental disorders and children with emotional disturbance, means that services provided to people with mental health problems are narrow (Talbot & Coburn, 2013)
The State and local authorities have used behavioural health care. However, there have been changes
Government funding includes structures such as Medicaid, which operates at the federal and state levels. Other programmes financed by the public sector include programmes that the State Fund finances through public mental health agencies, and also blocks the federal government grants that are received by the states (Garfield, 2011)
This source provides additional funding for behavioural health in the US. Initially, this was not intended to finance oral health. However, it now serves as a framework for expanding behavioural health financing in the United States. Under Obamacare, all Americans live up to 133% of poverty. Most people who have the right to mental health problems (Garfield, 2011) suffer from mental problems
Block grants provide financial assistance to states and territories that enable them to provide comprehensive mental health to adults in the community, suffering from serious mental illness, as well as children with emotional disabilities. The fund monitors progress towards full community mental health systems, including technical assistance to the Council for Mental Health Planning and States (CFDA, 2014)
Finance for Behaviour in the Private Sector comes from private insurance and pocket expenses. Other sources of funding include philanthropic care, although this role is secondary to health financing (Garfield, 2011)
Coventry’s health policy covers me, and it provides the benefits of mental health. Coventry provides mental advantages that are comparable to medical services for financial restrictions and treatment (deductions and sharing) for the Mental Health Equality Act 2008. My view is that health benefits should not be distinguished from the advantages of mental health. This is important to me, because if there is no parity, most Americans with mental disabilities will experience cost-sharing arrangements, financial constraints and reduced coverage, which will exclude certain conditions, as well as restrictions on the type of procedures and duration of treatment. All this can lead to poor and inadequate health care and health consequences
The following services for psychiatric care and treatment are available in Las Vegas
Accesable services to combat drugs and alcohol include outpatient services, fixed health centres, rehabilitation centres, rehabilitation centres, group and private counselling services (grant, 2014)
In two words, the mental health system in the United States continues to face serious staffing problems, evidence-based applications and funding. Similarly, mental health services are mainly offered by primary health care services, especially in rural areas. It should be noted that some insurance companies providing mental health services provide parity services related to the 2008 Mental Health Act
Garfield, R. L. (2011).
Goldman, N. H., Buck, J. A. & Thompson, C. (2009).
Grant, N. (2014).
National Alliance for Mental Illments (2014).
Russell, L. (2010).
Talbot, J. A. & Coburn, A. F. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for improving mental health services in long-term rural care